SV pix from SoCalRider.com, Palomar 10/6

[Guzzigirl2000]

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_114.html (my bike)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_121.html (me and my bike)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_187.html (gregg)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_189.html (svs)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_195.html (svs)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_207.html (SVers, I just missed them)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_211.html (brienne in action)

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_238.html

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_152.html (TL)

[Kurt'sSV]

You can tell that Gregg is fast because his pic is so blurry (or maybe it's just a slow camera) .

[bwarbiany]

God, I didn't get any lean in that picture :(

It makes me look bad :mad:

Brad

[Burst]

Gotta be a slow camera kurt. I am not *that* fast......

There's one of Bill also....

http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_188.html

[Kurt'sSV]

Okay, so it must be the camera 'cause we both know Bill's slow as shit. J/K:D

[ersigh]

The quality of their pictures is always really low... I was wondering if they use a camcorder or sumthin ... and just take still shots but ... usually those are even MORE pixelized ... (the quality is just low enough to make me wonder tho')

[WildBillF1]

Originally posted by Kurt'sSV
Okay, so it must be the camera 'cause we both know Bill's slow as shit. J/K:D

Its the camera...I knew I that I was having a shitty day when I got passed going uphill by these guys. Okay so now my ego is shot....I came home....pulled 3 spark plug wires....and put the training wheels back on.:clown:
http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_186.html http://www.socalrider.com/Pictures2002/1006Pal/Pal1006_247.html

Hey Guzzigirl - We saw you coming down when we were making our first run to the top.

[Kurt'sSV]

Hey Bill, what's up with your avatar? It looks like a pic from an old Nintendo game.

[WildBillF1]

I don't know. Please be more specific. Nintendo, Super Nintendo, or Nintendo 64? :D
I seriously don't know....it looks okay through my pc/monitor. Does it really look like shit?

[idukes]

Bill, there's no shame in being passed by Lance Armstrong, that guy's fast. There's no need to hide your face by pixellating your avatar.

Ian

[Burst]

Hey Bill, at least you didn't have a roller blader riding your ass....

[Gmoney]

Originally posted by WildBillF1
I don't know. Please be more specific. Nintendo, Super Nintendo, or Nintendo 64? :D
I seriously don't know....it looks okay through my pc/monitor. Does it really look like shit?

it looks mega grainy. i dont thinks its even nintendo. more like atari 2600.
maybe its our computers? but every one elses avatar looks fine.

[SoCalRPM]

Sean has to heavily compress them for the web. Bandwith is expensive and his photos are some one of the most popular pages.

He uses a Kodak 2 megapixel. Don't know the model.

[ersigh]

Originally posted by SoCalRPM
Sean has to heavily compress them for the web. Bandwith is expensive and his photos are some one of the most popular pages.

He uses a Kodak 2 megapixel. Don't know the model.

That would explain a lot ... Kodak's are "ok" but tend to suffer at capturing color, on all levels ... (like canon does blues vividly, and sony tends to be better at reds, although the newer sonys are pretty well balanced) ...

What I'm seeing is not compression for bandwidth ... it's just a general low quality to the camera ... just the fact that he's using a 2 megapixel will also do that, because he has so much less to work with when downsizing ...

(i'm not saying the pictures (framing etc) themselves are bad, just the quality)